Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: Mixed Role Fighters (design system)
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:38:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: Mixed Role Fighters (design system)
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 04:01:32PM -0700, Eric Foley wrote:
> I actually had to kind of chuckle when I saw the
> IJN designs and saw the comment, "These ships are punching above
their
> NPV compared to fleet book designs in test battles due to the
fighters,
> we're looking into it..." Well, duh... their carriers sport half
again as
> many fighters as the fleet book carriers do and they're getting
> attack-interceptors while the fleet book ships don't.
Actually, the multirole attacker-interceptors seem to be costed about
right - they can only choose role once per turn, after all. Do you
really expect them to beat more than twice their number in standard
fighters?
I agree that carrying a lot of fighters and missiles is overpowered
under the current rules, but I don't think there's a lot of contention
about that, and it seems only fair to warn people!
Roger
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l