Prev: Re: [GZG] Asteroid fields and the Great Monkey Dance :-D (was: Re: The Great Premeasuring Monkey Dance Next: Re: [GZG] Asteroid fields and the Great Monkey Dance :-D (was: Re: The Great Premeasuring Monkey Dance

Re: [GZG] Asteroid fields and the Great Monkey Dance :-D (was: Re: The Great Premeasuring Monkey Dance

From: Robert Mayberry <robert.mayberry@g...>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 08:16:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] Asteroid fields and the Great Monkey Dance :-D (was: Re: The Great Premeasuring Monkey Dance

MK is absolutely right, but the gripping hand is that if you're using
FT to model star wars, or other space opera, then you need lots of
asteroids, preferably bouncing off one another and sprouting gigantic
beasties.

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote:
> On the other other hand, I believe the original phrase used was
'asteroid
> swarms' not belt. Local conditions, while age-of-the-galaxy rare for a
Star
> Wars version, can vary, and other world systems are proving stranger
than
> our current experience.
>
> I accept denser populations than we currently experience as a real
> possibility, and worth modelling.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] Asteroid fields and the Great Monkey Dance :-D (was: Re: The Great Premeasuring Monkey Dance Next: Re: [GZG] Asteroid fields and the Great Monkey Dance :-D (was: Re: The Great Premeasuring Monkey Dance