Prev: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre? Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

From: "John Lerchey" <lerchey@g...>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:31:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

I work at Carnegie Mellon. About 6 months ago, I got in touch with a
buddy who's a sys admin at the robotics consortium.  I took my 12 year
old son to see the Crusher and it's predecessors, among other robotic
delights  It's even cooler than it looks. :)

J

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Jacob Walker <jwalker@srpfcu.org> wrote:
> FYI from another list.
>
>
>
> Huzzah,
>
> Jacob
>
>
>
> From: twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Al Hazlett
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:36 AM
> To: twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?
>
>
>
> It only weighs 7 tons, and its air-transportable -- you'd have to call
> it Ogre Lite...
>
> Alex h
>
> --- In twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com, <sposobi@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Interesting item I just ran across. may be old news. A vehicle
> that is "state-of-the-art in autonomous unmanned ground vehicles
> systems.â€
>>
>>
>> Fred
>>
>> http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=8962
>>
>
> ,_._,___
>
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use
> of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender
> and delete all copies
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre? Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?