Prev: Re: [GZG] More re: [OFFICIAL] Little contest for FT "unknownfleet"..... Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

[GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

From: "Jacob Walker" <jwalker@s...>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:17:08 -0400
Subject: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lFYI
from another list.



Huzzah,

Jacob



From: twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Al Hazlett
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:36 AM
To: twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?



It only weighs 7 tons, and its air-transportable -- you'd have to call
it Ogre Lite...

Alex h

--- In twohourwargames@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:twohourwargames%40yahoogroups.com> , <sposobi@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Interesting item I just ran across. may be old news. A vehicle
that is "state-of-the-art in autonomous unmanned ground vehicles
systems.” 
> 
> 
> Fred
> 
> http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=8962
>

,_._,___ 

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use
of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is
strictly
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.


Prev: Re: [GZG] More re: [OFFICIAL] Little contest for FT "unknownfleet"..... Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?