Prev: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS Next: Re: [GZG] theoretical rules schedule? (was Re: And now for something completely different...)

Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

From: "Eli Arndt" <emu2020@c...>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:58:02 -0700
Subject: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lAn
excellent point.



All the more reason for vehicles in colonial service to be wheeled.



-Eli



From: gzg-l-bounces@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of John
Tailby
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 7:32 PM
To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS



I have seen pictures of Strikers that have made it back to base with
shattered wheels, something that a tracked vehicle that suffers track
damage can't do. 

I think that is where the "ignore mobility kills on multi wheeled
vehicles" comes from. A Striker or LAV can proably lose 2-3 wheels
before becomming immobilised on the spot whereas a broken track link
could immobilise a Bradley or M113 type APC.



Prev: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS Next: Re: [GZG] theoretical rules schedule? (was Re: And now for something completely different...)