Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: Adrian1 <al.ll@t...>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:19:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Oerjan Ariander wrote:
> Eli: *Light* hovercraft are less likely to trigger pressure mines than

> other types of ground vehicles are, but they are just as vulnerable to

> mines with tilt-rod, magnetic etc fuses. However, if you put armour on
a 
> hovercraft its ground pressure rises quite rapidly, so by the time
you've 
> put MBT-level armour on it it'll be about as likely to trigger a
pressure 
> mine as a light APC is. (And it won't be able to move over water or
other 
> soft surfaces either - a heavy hovercraft will sink...)
>
>   

Where doe the Russian Zubr come in?

What would a DS2 Zubr look like?

While it acts in many ways like a hovercraft, is it ship?

Could I PLEASE have one as a land GEV O:-)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?