Re: [GZG] Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi! - Artillery
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:42:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi! - Artillery
>If you're in a position to land artillery pieces, you likely have
>ships in orbit. If you have ships in orbit, you're probably laying a
>string of commo, surveillance, and navigation sats for your ground
>If not, then not. As I said, getting into "what ifs" has been
>adequately demonstrated to be excessively repetitive and pointless.
>But normal artillery survey techniques require fairly good maps of the
>area you're fighting over. The point is that you have to know where
>you are and where the enemy is in order to do the math as to how to
>get a quantity of explosive from where you are to where the enemy is.
>The speed of modern techniques comes largely from computerizing this
>process rather than doing manual math or going off paper charts. If
>you don't have a way to do this AT ALL, then you cannot conduct
>effective artillery fire AT ALL.
That was my Dad's job, in the Western Desert in 1941-43; Royal
Artillery, Battery Survey Party for a 25pdr unit (and later on 5.5
inch guns). A bunch of blokes with a couple of jeeps and a 15cwt,
whose job it was to scout and survey the gun positions for the next
engagement. I still have some of his tables, notebooks and a
double-cursor slide rule with gunlaying data on the back....
>If you presume that the invaders have neither navigation sats nor
>precise maps of the invaded planet, then you actually have a LOT of
>problems, not merely inaccurate artillery fire.
>I leave it to other people to discuss the question of whether there
>are alternate techniques available to a force of Hypothetical PSB-Tech
>which can pinpoint one's location without sats. If you know where the
>artillery piece is and where the observer is to a high degree of
>precision, then with a modern laser rangefinder you can find distance
>and direction from the observer. Calculating the target's location is
>a matter of a heartbeat for a computer, and then dropping precision
>fire on his head doesn't take long once you have this information.
>On 7/8/08, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Hi all
>> Can I just jump in about this point of yours John.
>> "But modern artillery needs only moments to prepare to fire. The
>> setup times to conduct indirect fire in WWII were required to
>> accurately survey the gun positions, something done by GPS
>> In a Sci-Fi planet assault scenario your unlikely to have GPS to
>> Does modern day artillery without GPS become no better than it's
>> Gzg-l mailing list
>"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
>and again. We're looking for thousands of Persians."
>Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l mailing list