Re: [GZG] FTverse colinies
From: "Robert Mayberry" <robert.mayberry@g...>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 10:36:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] FTverse colinies
Beth,
Great email! I never expected that someone of your caliber was working
this problem... I'm a bit intimidated.
I did have some questions about your model. (I also skimmed the
archives also so I could see the context.)
* First, you project a population of nearly 34 billion for Earth in
2188. The UN population projections I saw when I was taking Human
Geography as an undergrad said that the current thinking is that the
population would level off at about 12 billion in the next couple
decades and remain flat. In much of the EU, they said the population
is actually already declining. What kinds of assumptions are they
making that make their results come out so differently?
* Do you make allowances for differing start dates for interstellar
expansion? I'm a business student by trade, but your numbers look
roughly like the outcome of a compound interest expansion. Time
becomes more important than income in those scenarios, so I'm
wondering if that applies to population growth, too. If that is the
case, then the question of how the NI competes efficiently with the IF
is pretty easy to answer: the NI's early work developing FTL meant
they were early in the space race. The IF, whether for cultural,
political, strategic, industrial or technological reasons, got into
the space game late.
* One area where I *might* have enough expertise to add something is
in the economics of migration. I've done a fair amount of business
modeling, and we know from FB1 how much a colony ship can hold, what
it costs, and what a typical ship's lifetime is. So with some
assumptions about what the colonist : infrastructure tonnage ratio
might be and an estimate for operating costs, I might be able to
estimate how economically feasible the project is, which could feed
into your assumptions about ease of colonization. *(It might also be
useful for determining the volume of interstellar commerce and how
economically viable piracy is.)
Rob
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:47 PM, <Beth.Fulton@csiro.au> wrote:
> G'day guys,
>
> For what its worth here is an old email containing rough population
> numbers, from some simple population models (one sex, simple
immigration
> and epidemic model components with shifting carrying capacity tied to
> planet type, tech level and infrastructure investment). Its possible
to
> refine them based on a two-sex model with metapopulation migration,
but
> despite that being on my "to-do list" for more than a year now I have
> had a serious lack of time to get it up and going. Now if I could
> justify giving the coding to my grad students as a class exercise it
may
> well get done before I retire ;)
>
> Cheers
>
> Beth
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beth.Fulton@csiro.au [mailto:Beth.Fulton@csiro.au]
> Sent: Sunday, 8 September 2002 11:42 PM
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Population Models
>
> G'day,
>
> I did up some more numbers. These are still rough, but they're a bit
> more
> polished than the last lot.
>
> Low estimate (space travel is restricted, terraforming is a slow
> process,
> society suffers from the aging problem and AIDS etc, though I skipped
> major
> natural disasters, a collapse of the ecosphere due to mismanagement
and
> a
> full on population crunch as I don't think we'd have time/economies
left
> to
> turn to the stars so quickly in that case)
> EARTH OFFWORLD TOTAL
> ESU 1.1 billion 7 million 1.107 billion
> FSE 167 million 4.5 million 171.5 million
> NAC 838 million 8 million 846 million
> NSL 115 million 8.5 million 123.5 million
> UN* 286 million 1.5 million 287.5 million
> FCT 25 million 285,000 25.29 million
> IC 505 million 300,000 505.3 million
> IF 640 million 400,000 640.4 million
> JAP 120 million 260,000 120.26 million
> KNG 15.5 million 30,000 15.53 million
> LLAR Nil 425,000 425,000
> NI Nil 180,000 180,000
> OU 29 million 225,000 29.23 million
> PAU 195 million 304,000 195.3 million
> RH 23 million 86,000 23.09 million
> SK Nil 194,000 194,000
> SWISS 5.2 million 225,000 5.43 million
>
> TOTAL 4.06 billion 32.4 million 4.09 billion
>
> * Read this as = a lot of the rest of humanity for now
>
>
> Middle estimate (pretty middle of the road on all assumptions)
> EARTH OFFWORLD TOTAL
> ESU 4.9 billion 2.1 billion 7 billion
> FSE 344 million 738 million 1.08 billion
> NAC 7.4 billion 2.15 billion 9.55 billion
> NSL 378 million 490 million 868 million
> UN* 958.5 million 250 million 1.2 billion
> FCT 143.3 million 7.2 million 150.5 million
> IC 717.5 million 56.7 million 774.2 million
> IF 1.02 billion 25.6 million 1.05 billion
> JAP 196 million 15 million 211 million
> KNG 20.5 million 2.4 million 22.9 million
> LLAR Nil 54 million 54 million
> NI Nil 15.7 million 15.7 million
> OU 40 million 20.4 million 60.4 million
> PAU 602.5 million 81.4 million 683.9 million
> RH 46.6 million 22.6 million 69.2 million
> SK Nil 10.6 million 10.6 million
> SWISS 11.1 million 10.9 million 22 million
>
> TOTAL 15.8 billion 6.0 billion 22.8 billion
>
>
> High estimate (you would have to be able to pack them into ships like
> sardines, have fleets on constant turn around to garden planets and
> figure
> out how to have artificial wombs or multiple births or huge support
> system
> to get this one done)
> EARTH OFFWORLD TOTAL
> ESU 9.8 billion 7 billion 16.8 billion
> FSE 1.2 billion 4 billion 5.2 billion
> NAC 11.05 billion 7.6 billion 18.65 billion
> NSL 845 million 4 billion 4.85 billion
> UN* 3 billion 875 million 3.88 billion
> FCT 419 million 440 million 859 million
> IC 1.6 billion 2 billion 3.6 billion
> IF 2.4 billion 3 billion 5.4 billion
> JAP 430 million 610 million 1.04 billion
> KNG 75 million 20 million 95 million
> LLAR Nil 348 million 348 million
> NI Nil 60 million 60 million
> OU 88 million 545 million 633 million
> PAU 2.6 billion 568 million 3.17 billion
> RH 295 million 275 million 570 million
> SK Nil 54 million 54 million
> SWISS 132 million 100 million 232 million
>
> TOTAL 33.9 billion 31.5 billion 65.4 billion
>
> As to the question about the inner systems I assumed they were split
> between
> all of humanity, but weighted towards the larger nations which
started
> FTL
> flights early rather than later.
>
> Cheers
>
> Beth
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>
--
Robert Mayberry
(678) 984-5113
Robert.Mayberry@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l