Re: FT Fleet formations was Re: [GZG] FT vector movement systems

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lRemember when I
said "Trivial"?  I do it just about every game.  I'd say it
doesn't gain me much but it is rare for my big ships to take much
damage.
Not that they couldn't but my small ships act as a screen and present
much
better targets.

NB:  I would not consider myself much better than a fair player.

Roger

On 3/6/07, Richard Bell <rlbell.nsuid@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/5/07, Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@rixmail.se > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > If OTOH you had played half a dozen games with either movement
system,
> > then
> > I would've mildly surprised if you *couldn't* work out appropriate
> > formation-change orders with at most a few seconds' extra effort.
> >
> > And if you had been a veteran FT player with scores or hundreds of
games
> > under your belt, then I would've been *extremely* surprised to hear
that
> > you had problems working out formation-change orders on the fly -
with
> > that
> > much experience it would, as Roger Books wrote, be trivial.
>
>
> Drop the other shoe.	What is the most complicated piece of
coordinated
> multiship maneuvering that you have done?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>