Prev: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] ping Next: Re: [GZG] ping

Re: [GZG] ping

From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:11:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] ping

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:23:38PM +0000, Phillip Atcliffe wrote:
>Mike Stanczyk wrote:
>>On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Roger Burton West wrote:
>>>Just make sure you don't make the same error as the designers of the
Ohio SSBN.
>>Sorry I've not heard that one.  Please retell or provide web
reference...
>Is this as in "it's _too_ quiet -- so quiet that it can be detected by
the 'hole' it makes in the background noise level"?

That's the version I've heard. If anyone can provide corroboration
(positive or negative) I'd like to know...

R
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] ping Next: Re: [GZG] ping