RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
From: "David Rodemaker" <dar@h...>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 07:54:57 -0600
Subject: RE: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Ground Zero Games wrote:
>> That's not the point. It's not simply a matter of basing - I want a
game
>> where the basic element is a team, not an individual figure.
>
>
> The direction in which I'm thinking is:
>
> Each stand of 2-4 figures represents a fireteam of infantry or a
specialist
> team (support weapon, observer, whatever). Vehicles based as singles.
> Activations given to platoon-sized units (as in DSII), typically 6-9
infantry
> bases or 3-4 vehicles. Infantry small-arms fire (including
small-calibre
> support fire) resolved on a group basis, ie: one platoon vs.another
with
> hits distributed among the target stands. Vehicle and other heavy
weapons
> fire individually. Typical "player force" for a small-to-medium game
with
> average tech levels would be reinforced company combat group, say a
2-3
> platoons of infantry, one or two platoons of AFVs plus HQ and attached
> sections of supporting elements.
>
> Is this the sort of level that most folks (assuming an interest in
15mm at
> all) are interested in?
>
> Jon (GZG)
YES!
David Rodemaker
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l