Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn 11/1/06,
laserlight@verizon.net <laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:

>
> You mean, after they finish screaming "Finish <expurgated> FT3,
<deleted>!
> And <censored> FMAS! And <expunged> Bugs Don't Surf Because They Died
of Old
> Age, <snipped>!" , I take it?

True dat.

>
> I think it'd have the "between command levels" problem again. One
squad,
> per FMAS, is fine. Two squads isn't a unit. Three squads plus a
command
> element is around 20-30 figures, which is probably too much.

I disagree with your "isn't a unit" statement.	I would say there were
plenty of examples where two squads were a "unit."  WW1, WW2, and
Vietnam.
I'm sure there are more modern examples.  I'm almost positive that it
will
exist in the future.

I do agree with your "between command levels" comment though -- I don't
think that would go away with using FMAS.  It might not be as evident
using
FMAS as as it is in SG2.

Damo