敒›敒›䝛䝚⁝敒›술䚠汵桔畲瑳倠慬瑹獥㽴⠠楓潭桗瑩⥥

Never said it wasn't, but especially 'one place that doesn't have
difficult
contradictions' seemed part of it. I was just thinking of ancillary
reasons
to continue with the process.

You aren't rethinking your participation?

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 10/27/2006 10:29:45 AM:

> >5) A new publication makes it a new game in some folks
> eyes. Those who may have stumbled on the few glaring
> inconsistancies may give it another try. Others try ANYTHING new.
> >
> >Smacks of marketing, but Jon's not above that, nor should he be.
>
> Jon's in business to make money, after all.  But my
> (possibly mistaken) impression of the origin of FT III was
> "People have to buy four books (FT2.5, MT, FB1, FB2) to
> get all the rules--maybe we should put the rules into a
> single book?"

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l