RE: [GZG]FullThrustCampaign(SimonWhite) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Fatigue isn't a crazy idea; for a campaign structure it's a useful way
to
model the long-term attrition of damage and obsolescence of tech (even
over
a few years of game time).  It's a good way to force decisions about
scrapping a ship early.  

Do I scrap it and replace it (and get some resources back)?  
Do I rebuilt it (which takes it back to new status but costs resources
and
time)?	
Do I repair it (which may take more resources than a rebuild, but less
time)?

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----
> mintroll-ft-list
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 1:25 AM
> Subject: [GZG] Full Thrust Campaign (SimonWhite)
> 
> Brendan typed:
> >> I liked the way fleets were organised to limit force sizes.
> 
> Thanks for the comments, the fatigue rules were a crazy idea 
> I had one day to add something - it probably was a bit on the 
> complicated side.
> The fleet groups was an atificial thing to add some sort of 
> cap/structure to the masses of ships running around.
> 
> Simon

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l