Re: [GZG] re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question
From: "John Atkinson" <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:22:13 +0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question
On 9/15/06, Roger Books <email@example.com> wrote:
> I need to give her a few times winning before I start trouncing
> Actually, the doctrine we worked up to go with her P.A. is they are
> never supposed to operate without the support of normal infantry.
> They have no heavy weapons of any sort.
ROFL! Yeah, that'll last until some bright boy in an Operations shop
gets a wild hair up his butt and convinces some commander (fresh from
an assignment at Army Headquarters, where his superior schmoozing
skills got him a battalion command) that PA don't really NEED support
for this operation. . .
> That said we also decided when we set up random scenarios there
> should be scenarios that involve the P.A. squad getting screwed by
> being tasked with unsupported operations because they are, well,
That happens a lot with more specialized equipment. . .
> So are you back in the States yet?
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again. We're looking for thousands of Persians."
Gzg-l mailing list