Re: [GZG] re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lJohn,

  I need to give her a few times winning before I start trouncing her*.
Actually, the doctrine we worked up to go with her P.A. is they are
never supposed to operate without the support of normal infantry.
They have no heavy weapons of any sort.

  That said we also decided when we set up random scenarios there
should be scenarios that involve the P.A. squad getting screwed by
being tasked with unsupported operations because they are, well,
P.A.

  So are you back in the States yet?

Roger

*trouncing her, yeah right.

On 9/15/06, John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/14/06, Roger Books <roger.books@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I just helped my GF design her ESU PA assault squad.  Slow Heavy PA
> > and half the 8 man squad has Flachette Cannons. (Assault Shotguns
> > with an impact of d10).
> >
> > Now I'm afraid to face them as she has seen the shock and awe PA
> > cause in  a close assault.
>
> That's why you put guys in no body armor (d4 armor, 8" movement) or
> light, fast PA, shooting gauss rifles (Impact d12) and let her chase
> them around the table.  Preferably through anti-armor minefields
> equipped with IFF.
>
> John
> --
> "Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
> and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
> --Vita Aureliani
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>