Re: RE: [GZG] Re: Fighter Fixes and Missile Debate

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lIf a player is not
smart enough to proactively maneuver when facing Salvo
Missiles it makes for a short game.

As far as I am concerned the only problem with SMs is they may take up a
bit
too much space and cost a bit much.
They are fine in one-on-one duals but are a bit week in Fleet actions.

Roger (FSE and Salvo Missile player with a fairly high accuracy.)

On 6/29/06, laserlight@verizon.net <laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Dean said:
> >One of the complaints I had heard of the original Full Thrust was the
> lack of weapons that make a player maneuver.	The Heavy Missile and
later
> the Salvo Missile did show up (with more later) so players have to
consider
> them in their movement, weather they are fired that turn or not.
>
> But he doesn't know that he needs to maneuver until after he's written
his
> orders. If you want to force him to maneuver, perhhaps just before
writing
> orders we should announce "launching ordnance"...
>
> And then maybe not place the missile markers until ships have made the
> first half of their move.
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>