Prev: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak Next: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

From: David Stokes <dstokes@d...>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:39:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

Doug Evans wrote:

>
>the 'lost' movement points have nothing to do with the size of any of
your
>thrusters, but the lessened slice of time devoted to your main
thrusters
>pointed in one direction.
>
>  
>
I could see that, and I haven't thought of it that way before. I don't 
know if that is how I want to play it, but it makes some sense.

I play both cinematic and vector in different contexts. (Actually, right

now I don't play at all. Is there anybody in Scotland up for a game?) 
Actually, cinematic does a good job simulating "movie physics" and I 
happily use for Star Wars, etc. I may have to try out Attack Vector: 
Tactical or other such systems for when I want a dose of the hard stuff.

David Stokes
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak Next: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak