Prev: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak Next: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:33:57 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak

> A current example: The orientation thruters on the Space Shuttle are
> smaller that either the main engines or the orbital manuevering
engines.

Sorry that a cinematic devotee pipes in, but the example is pretty much
moot in my estimation. I realize that some rationalizations have it that
the rotational time is insignificant in the turn, but I always thought
the
numbers used were pretty arbitrary.

In fact, since vector has a ship's 'final' orientation in each turn, I
would put it to you that the rotational time IS significant, and
therefore,
the 'lost' movement points have nothing to do with the size of any of
your
thrusters, but the lessened slice of time devoted to your main thrusters
pointed in one direction.

However, it is silly, and I will have nothing to do with it.

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak Next: Re: [GZG] [FT] Vectoring Kra'Vak