RE: [GZG] When placing Modular Fighters on carriers
From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:30:26 +1100
Subject: RE: [GZG] When placing Modular Fighters on carriers
Hanger bays are already considered to have a suitable selection of
and weapon pods included in the mass required. Of the 1.5 mass per
of hanger space only 0.6-1.0 of the mass is the fighter and loading
equipment; the rest is launch/recovery/rearming/repair and other support
equipment. There is a lot of empty space in a hanger.
If you want to specifically require extra storage for Omni-pods, let
have 2 configurations available as part of the basic hanger and require
mass of cargo per squadron for each additional configuration.
ie. A Mass 9 hanger + 1 cargo would have 6 fighters and carry the
& B configuration equipment.
If you're converting for Battletech/Battlespace, remember that
uses a 10-fighter squadron as standard (so Mass 15 hangers).
'Neath Southern Skies
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:20 PM
Subject: [GZG] When placing Modular Fighters on carriers
Now should a force equiped with Omni-Fighters, still be able to place 6
fighters in a Mass 9 Hanger bay, and having the ability to retrofit pods
current needs, or should the carrier need to alot Cargo space to have
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email.
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated.
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
of this type from DVA.
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.
Gzg-l mailing list