Prev: Re: [FT] Fleet-wide ADFC (Was: FB3 ships, was Re: Official Japanese ships??) Next: Re: [FT] Fleet-wide ADFC (Was: FB3 ships, was Re: Official Japanese ships??)

Re: [FT] Fleet-wide ADFC (Was: FB3 ships, was Re: Official Japanese ships??)

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:10:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [FT] Fleet-wide ADFC (Was: FB3 ships, was Re: Official Japanese ships??)

> From: "R. Bryett" <rbryett@mail.com>
> > I haven't been playing FT long, so maybe this is a sillyquestion,
> but why
> > WOULDN'T you fit ADFC to any vessel mounting PDS?
>
> No reason.  A lot of "design your own" ships mount ADFC
> plus more PDS
> than the Fleet Book ships do.  I suspect that when FB1 was
> written, no
> one tried a battle where one side only brought carriers and lots of
> fighters.

Or versus massive numbers of SM's at slow speeds/ on a tight table. ;->=

Another question, though, is it more worthwhile to buy bays of
interceptors, and not have the points tied to particular places in the
fleet. Assuming you aren't moving the whole thing as one tight mass, of
course.

Haven't cogitated on the cost analysis, mind you, as fighters ARE
expensive, and, if you use the rules, limited by endurance. However,
they
can concentrate their power.

> I haven't yet acquired any "official" ships, so I'm playing with a
> home-brewed fleet based on plastic wall plugs of various
> sizes on flying bases...

I love it! The domed ends and funky ridges could stand proudly in any
episode of Dr. Who. I tried wire connectors because I thought the
'wings'
had lovely George Pal connotations.

The_Beast

Prev: Re: [FT] Fleet-wide ADFC (Was: FB3 ships, was Re: Official Japanese ships??) Next: Re: [FT] Fleet-wide ADFC (Was: FB3 ships, was Re: Official Japanese ships??)