Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions) Next: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)

Re: SaVasku Comment ( was Re: Fire Control lock-on)

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: SaVasku Comment ( was Re: Fire Control lock-on)

I am sorry to say that your example only serves to
prove that not all gamers are competent.   If you
choose to play by your enemys rules you will lose.

Bye for now,
John L.

--- VinsFullThrust@aol.com wrote:

>  
> In a message dated 6/27/2005 4:41:48 PM Eastern
> Daylight Time,  
> john_t_leary@yahoo.com writes:
> 
> At the  present time, SaVasKu are effectively
> invincable in any 'open ended' space	combat.
> The only way to have a combat with the 'S'
> be interesting is to	have some sort of a
> 'point in space' to attack/defend.
> 
> Bye for  now,
> John L.
> 
> 
> 
> Not true, they are not invicnable. I have been them
> in games both as the	"S" 
> and agaisnt the "S". I have lost playing them and
> have won playing agaisnt  
> them with NSL and NAC and even ESY ships...A resent
> gae played, I used NSL 
> ships  and an ally used IJN ships. the eemy was
> KraVak and there was a presence of 
>  SaVasku as well. The SaVasku took out most of the
> KraVak without taking 
> enough  damage to mean anything. Combines forces of
> the NSL and IJN, equalling 
> roughly  1800 points took out the Savasku force of
> roughly 2000
> Vince
> 

		
____________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions) Next: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)