Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions) Next: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)

Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)

From: Stephen Scothern <scotherns@g...>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:34:45 +0100
Subject: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)

"Andy Skinner" wrote:
> The main reason for doing the lock-on is to provide a place to hang
stealth, ECM, 
> target agility, etc.
> 
> The lock-on only applies to weapons requiring a fire control.
> 

This means that the relative effectiveness of indirect fire weapons
will be increased. Should these weapons be made more expensive to
reflect this? Balancing this might be very tricky.

Steve Scothern

Prev: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions) Next: Re: Fire Control lock-on (was: Re: [FT] squadron suggestions)