Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:31:38 -0500 (EST), John K Lerchey
<lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

> 'cause some of the other settings would presumabley be better at
hitting
> disprsed infantry (wide area kill), and the "tight beam disintigrate"
> (anti-tank) shot might take a lot more energy out of the power pack.
:)

But then you gotta house rule something so that phasers are more
effective on wide area settings. . .

At a certain point you're not playing Stargrunt, you're playing "My
house rules sorta kinda based on Stargrunt mechanics."

John
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani