Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:06:12 -0500
Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
At 8:59 AM -0600 1/26/05, Allan Goodall wrote:
>
>This is a perennial problem with wargames. Most players have a
reasonable
>idea of what they will expect in any given scenario. They tend to use
>certain weapons inappropriately just because they have them. They often
>cite "but it was used in this way back in...", etc. to justify it. A
>good example is that video of the Israeli tank taking out the single
>shooter. It was a judgment call on the part of the tank crew that they
>would be better off using a tank cannon round to take out that one
>shooter.
That's called intelligence and some idea of the
OOB of the other guys. By the same token I can
probably dig up many accounts of the use of
PIATs, Bazookas and 6 pounder AT guns used to hit
a steeple or high tower that was being used by a
sniper that was holding up an advance. IF you're
being shot at and you have a weapon that'lld to
the job, you'll probably use it.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------