Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:36:13 +0100
Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:08:21 -0800, Sylvester M. W. <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> There's a couple reasons. Why waste that much battery power
> incernating a single person, when a low setting can still guarentee a
> kill but give you enough charge for another five shots. Another
> possibility is windup. Perhaps it takes a few seconds for the emitter
> to charge to full for the heavy shots, whereas it can cycle faster on
> a lower setting.
OK, then how do we model that differently than the ammo carrying issue?
My point is this: It is gamey and not taking into account real-world
factors to permit people to shoot off their anti-armor weapons at
every clump of bushes they desire with no thought to the future.
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again. We're looking for thousands of Persians."