Prev: Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style Next: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:06:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:25:36 +1100, Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
<Beth.Fulton@csiro.au> wrote:

> other backgrounds. One of the backgrounds I use it in has a power
where
> their anti-armour is small enough that ammo is no longer a restriction
> factor (I'm guessing the same would be true for Star Trek-like
> background where you just dialup the phaser appropriately). In a
> background like that it wouldn't be doctrine anymore so something very
> different could pan out I'd expect.

So, if you can just dialup the phaser appropriately, then why would
you ever use it on the lower setting?

John
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani

Prev: Re: [FH] Vectorverse was Re: NAC - American style Next: Re: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets