RE: [SGII] Fire of AT Missiles at disperesed tagets

I have to side with the doctrine is for use against
bunkers and light skinned vehicles (of which PA can be
considered a part of).	As John A mentioned, you will
not have any more after you shoot them and so you are
not going to waste them on a dispersed target that you
can hit with small arms fire.  

Now you may game that the missle operator takes the
shot and game the effects, he has some free will.  You
also need to game the fact that his squad leader is
then going to be very unhappy with him and so next
engagement he will not be carrying the missle. 
Someone who knows what an armored target is will be.

This all changes if your doctrine is to supply your
troops with 10s of these in each section for use
against PA.  In that case using one up on dispersed
targets would not hurt your level of supply (Say 50
per platoon <G>).

Bob Makowsky
Former 11H Heavy Anti-Armor Crewman 

--- Adrian Johnson <adrian@stargrunt.ca> wrote:

> 
> I'm with Owen on this one.  When we play, I allow
> GMS/P vs. infantry
> squads, but the roll is guidance vs. ECM (usually d6
> - sure, they're not
> carrying much in the way of ECM gear which would
> suggest the minimum d4,
> 

***Good ideas snipped to protect bandwidth impaired
***

> ***************************************
> 
> Adrian Johnson
> adrian@stargrunt.ca
> http://www.stargrunt.ca
> 
> ***************************************
> 
> 
>