Prev: Re: FT in centimeter scale? | Next: Re: FT in centimeter scale? |
True,
We don't need the bigger tables to play, although we tend to play
battles with 2000-3000 points, so we really need fair sized tables
anyway.
And like I said, our experience is that 1mu=1cm does work, but mainly
because we've no grounds for comparison, ie we don't know any better.
Thomas
http://www.bedog.net/ft/
Frits Kuijlman wrote:
> Laserlight wrote:
>
>>>Are there any reason why one shouldn't play like this?
>
>
> Ummm, maybe a dumb question, but all measurements scale, right? So
> this would mean you would need less room to play an engagement.
> Or you have relatively more space to go faster, make wider turns etc.
>
> The only problem with cm's vs. inches is that measurement errors might
> be relatively larger, which might have an impact in certain nitpicky
> situations.
>
> Frits
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 17.01.2005
Prev: Re: FT in centimeter scale? | Next: Re: FT in centimeter scale? |