Re: [FT] Crew quality house rules

Depends on the crews.  In Tuffley's write up of the PAU, there are some
PAU forces that are as good or better than their super power
counterparts, while others create a moving navigational hazard.
 
If the PAU takes pride in their ship, they will generally keep it in
good working order while the NAC's may have deferred the maintenance of
the ship sue to operational requirements of the navy.

"laserlight@quixnet.net" <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:
> >I like the idea of doing crew quality stuff but what about the
> technology? All things being equal would a poor crew really misread
> the dials and instruments so much to warrent a d10?

Look at the ship conditions of the navies of, say, Cote d'Ivoire or
Nigeria. (in fact, this argues more for "poorer crew quality means you
take irreparable thresholds before the game starts")

Or to put it another way: if a first-rate NAC crew is facing a PAU
colonial
crew in identical NAC frigates, which will have an advantage, and by how
much? 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?	Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com