Re: Asymmetry was: Well, too interesting

--- John K Lerchey <lerchey@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

> Allowing for armor to be equal all around or to be
> oddly balanced is fine, 
> but it does mean that you'll have to pay for armor
> on each facing 
> (assuming a point system). 

That's the plan.  And as Laserlight pointed out, the
issue of front-loading armor has already been
addressed.  The end solution has not yet been reached,
but it's a matter of details.



=====
"In life, you must try and be the type of person that your dog thinks
you are."

- Anonymous

	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail