Prev: Re: SG-1 in SG2 Next: RE: SG-1 in SG2

Re: SG-1 in SG2

From: J L Hilal <jlhilal@y...>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: SG-1 in SG2

--- Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> At 2:37 PM -0700 7/15/04, John Atkinson wrote:
>
> >That would make it as effective as an M-240 MAG and it
> >definitely is not.  I know that for reasons of
> >parlimentary financial parsiminiousness our Australian
> >brethren have been forced to adopt it in that role
> >(pseudo-GPMG) but it is not designed to fill that role
> >nor does it do so with effectiveness.
>
> Yep. GPMG's should put put more fire, more accurately at a longer 
> range. 30 Caliber MMGs/GPMGs are effective in their anti area roles 
> out to 1000 meters or more by virtue of the caliber ballistics and 
> tripod arrangements.
> 

Mr. Gill, you are the one who brought up Qx3 for the M249 in the first
place.	If you hadn't, I never would have suggested it.

J

Prev: Re: SG-1 in SG2 Next: RE: SG-1 in SG2