Re: FC and stealth was: Four years without thrust
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:42:19 +0200
Subject: Re: FC and stealth was: Four years without thrust
KHR wrote:
> >A substantial problem with the FC-as-anti-ECM mechanic is that it
makes
> >multiple FCs vastly more valuable than they are now.
>
>Should depend on the mechanism in question, wouldn't it ?
>
>After all, if you have to concentrate several firecontrols on one
target
>and/or for one weapon, you can't use them for something else.
If you have to concentrate several fire controls on one target and/or
for
one weapon, *ships with only a single operational fire control can't
fire
at all*."
Which, as Roger says, means that the mechanic makes multiple FCSs vastly
more valuable than they are now.
Regards,
Oerjan
oerjan.ohlson@telia.com
"Life is like a sewer.
What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry