Prev: Re: Four years without thrust Next: FC and stealth was: Four years without thrust

Re: Four years without thrust

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:52:21 -0500
Subject: Re: Four years without thrust



***
>How about an ECM mechanic somehow opposed by the target's fire control?
>Allocate firecons to cracking it to partially or totally negate the
effects.

A substantial problem with the FC-as-anti-ECM mechanic is that it makes
multiple FCs vastly more valuable than they are now.
***

Am I the only one that sees this as a fairly complex approach, and that
being an even bigger problem? Using optional procedures often have a
'may
unbalance' codicle attached, but K.I.S.S. tends to trump other
considerations. An SFB-style EW auction scares me...

The_Beast

Prev: Re: Four years without thrust Next: FC and stealth was: Four years without thrust