Prev: Re: UN ships online eh? Next: Re: UN ships online eh?

RE: UN ships online eh?

From: "Matt Tope" <mptope@o...>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:13:44 -0000
Subject: RE: UN ships online eh?

Well it is an anti matter missile, so a hit which destroys the missile
would
probably still result in the anti-matter detonating as its containment
field
fails and it slams into normal matter (OK, this is stretching my slender
grasp on physiscs waypast breaking point), so rather than a big
controlled
explosion, you get a smaller not so well controlled explosion.

Maybe.

Regards,

Matt Tope

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[mailto:owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU]On Behalf Of Jerry Acord
Sent: 18 February 2004 16:04
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: UN ships online eh?

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Roger Burton West wrote:

> These questions are being mulled over. Please post any more that you
> come up with!

Re: AMTs -- why do successful hits on the missile reduce its blast
radius
/ damage, instead of simply destroying the missile?  If it's a physical
missile (as opposed to, say, the Plasma Bolt), either it detonates or
it's
destroyed and doesn't, right?

Cheers,
Jerry

--
Jerry Acord [+] acord@imagiware.com [+] http://imagiware.com/acord

Prev: Re: UN ships online eh? Next: Re: UN ships online eh?