Re: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion
From: "Don M" <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:29:00 -0600
Subject: Re: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion
Yeah it's great fodder for the rules lawyers amoung us lol.
Oh well nothing is ever quiet full proof is it?.........)
----- Original Message -----
From: kevinbalentine@verizon.net
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion
That's what I think too. Of course that probably means there is some
fatal flaw in there somewhere :-)
On 4 Feb 2004 at 16:13, Don M wrote:
> I hadn't thought of that but, it's simple and elegant enough to just
> work....)
>
> Don
>
Original idea:
> This is an off-the-cuff idea, but has anyone considered giving
> warships a "built-in" fighter defense value? Something like, for
every
> x mass of the ship, the ship gets y PDS systems?