Prev: RE: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion Next: Re: [SG2] Alternate Quick Combat Resolution (Modified Impact Versus Armour Procedure)

Re: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion

From: kevinbalentine@v...
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:06:12 -0600
Subject: Re: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion

That's what I think too. Of course that probably means there is some 
fatal flaw in there somewhere :-)

On 4 Feb 2004 at 16:13, Don M wrote:
 
> I hadn't thought of that but, it's simple and elegant enough to just
> work....)
> 
> Don
> 

Original idea:

> This is an off-the-cuff idea, but has anyone considered giving
> warships a "built-in" fighter defense value? Something like, for every
> x mass of the ship, the ship gets y PDS systems?

Prev: RE: [FT] Yet Another, another fighters suggestion Next: Re: [SG2] Alternate Quick Combat Resolution (Modified Impact Versus Armour Procedure)