Re: Re: [FT] seeking Salvo Missile advice
From: <apter@b...>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:46:22 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [FT] seeking Salvo Missile advice
>
> From: Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu>
> Date: 2003/12/30 Tue PM 05:04:20 GMT
> To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [FT] seeking Salvo Missile advice
>
>
>
>
>
> >Which still begs the counter-question *why* the infractructure can't
be
> >attacked :-/
>
> No it doesn't; plenty easy PS(ocialogical)B has been offered. You
don't
> have to accept, but it's already been posted.
>
> The_Beast
>
Do not forget infrastructure can have defenses. Local point defense
ships do not need to pay for hyper drive. Defense stations do not even
need maneuver. This can lead to a greater cost in missiles needed to
overwhelm the defenses. What you get is an arms race.
However in a one off game you get cheese whiz (A short one sided game
good for a few laughs in retrospect).
Andy