[FT] Follow-up One-off Poll

I don't want to step on Chris' toes, but here's a follow-up.

A) When you play one-off games, do you:

A1) Fight a battle per a pre-designed scenario;

A2) Create two fleets based on points and just slug it out;

A3) A mixture of both (build a fleet to a specific point size, and 
use it in a scenario, either blind or knowing the scenario ahead of 
time)?

B) When you play one-off games, do you:

B1) Play to specific victory conditions (half the fleet destroyed, a 
certain point value of ships destroyed, a certain scenario specific 
requirement);

B2) Play until one side is completely destroyed, leaves the table, or 
one player resigns?

C) When you play one-off games, do you:

C1) Have some sort of morale or campaign background rule that 
prevents ships from fighting to the death (the crew don't want to 
die, the ship has a "worth" outside of the battle and can't just be 
sacrificed for no gain);

C2) Fight to the death, morale rules be darned?

-- 

Allan Goodall		     agoodall@hyperbear.com
http://www.hyperbear.com

"Now, see, if you combine different colours of light, you get white!
Try that with Play-Doh and you get brown! How come?" - Alan Moore &
   Kevin Nolan, "Jack B. Quick, Boy Inventor"