Prev: Re: Minnesota players? Next: RE: Minnesota players?

Re: Fighters that bad? Re: Soap bubbles?

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:14:55 -0500
Subject: Re: Fighters that bad? Re: Soap bubbles?

At 3:58 PM -0500 2/19/03, laserlight@quixnet.net wrote:
>
>SMR are less of a problem because it's possible to miss entirely, or to
>have that lovely barrage of missiles all home on one DD instead of the
BB
>that you were aiming for.  Either way, they're a one-shot weapon. 
Fighters
>get to go on to the next target.

Not torpedo Bombers. One thing the rules really make hard to run is 
Mixed groups of fighters for multi role operations. 2 Interceptors, 2 
Heavys, 2 Torps and 2 Attacks. Run an operation like that and see if 
the rules work.
-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com		 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-	 The director of Home Security encourages you to       - 
-	   turn in your neighbor & spy on your friends.        -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -	

----------------------------------------------------------------

Prev: Re: Minnesota players? Next: RE: Minnesota players?