Prev: Re: Soap bubbles? Next: RE: E-bombs as Anti-PA, anti-electronic

Re: Soap bubbles?

From: Ryan M Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:14:48 -0500
Subject: Re: Soap bubbles?

The problem as someone pointed out is that fighters have a high 
utility threshold.

In my opinion, the game should have provisions for the carriers to be 
off board and a phase in the operations side where the carriers 
launch from off board. A hunt by the other side for the carriers 
should be a possibility for the other side to deal with. Carriers are 
far more valid as a platform if they're beyond visual and sensor 
range.

As far as soap-bubbles being valid, what were the CVLs classed as? 
Those certainly seem soap-bubbly. But then so does the Atlantic 
Conveyor. Both types were valid units in a tactical sense. Both
-- 
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
- Ryan Montieth Gill			     '01 Honda Insight -
- rmgill@SPAmindspring.com			    '85 CB700S -
- ryan.gill@SPAMturner.com		 '76 Chevy Monte Carlo -
- www.mindspring.com/~rmgill		       '72 Honda CB750 -
-				      '60 Daimler FV701H Mk2/3 -
-				   '42 Daimler Scout Car Mk II -
-	      I speak not for CNN, nor they for me	       -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-	 The director of Home Security encourages you to       -
-	   turn in your neighbor & spy on your friends.        -
----------------------------------------------------------------
-  C&R-FFL  /  Protect your electronic rights!	  \ EFF-ACLU   -
- SAF & NRA/  Join the EFF!  http://www.eff.org/   \ DoD #0780 -
----------------------------------------------------------------

Prev: Re: Soap bubbles? Next: RE: E-bombs as Anti-PA, anti-electronic