Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV
From: Brian Bilderback <greywanderer987@y...>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV
--- Hugh Fisher <laranzu@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> OK. So, I'll rephrase my question:
>
> If there is an imbalance in the points system, is
> it necessary
> to bring in a new calculation formula and value for
> every ship
> in every fleet because of this?
While I tend to fall into the Goodall/Ohlson camp on
this issue, I will say no -- not every fleet. Only
those fleets being commanded by players
> Full Thrust is remarkably simple and playable. If
> it isn't
> badly broken (as yes I now see the fighter stacks
> are) why try
> to fix it?
The point OO and Allan are making is (and, like you,
I'll let others more qualified make that point better)
that WRT the points, it IS badly broken.
=====
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com