Prev: Re: [GZG-OLC] February Update Next: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV

Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV

From: Brian Bilderback <greywanderer987@y...>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:37:03 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV


--- Derk Groeneveld <derk@cistron.nl> wrote:
> Oerjan Ohlson wrote:

> > This means that if you choose two forces with the
> same points value 
> > and pit them against one another, each of them
> should therefore win 
> > roughly half of the battles.
> >
> 
> I beg to differ. The above can only apply to
> balanced fleets. If players 
> are using fairly specialist fleets, there is no way
> in which a point 
> system can compensate for this (e.g. a fleet with NO
> fighter defence 
> against an 'all' fighter fleet). It is the players
> responsibility to 
> create a USEFUL combination within the points system
> determined frame.

I believe OO acknowledged that with his comments
regarding luck and player quality, which you seem to
have conveniently cut.	It's easy to dispute half an argument.....

=====
Qui me amat, amet et canem meum.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: [GZG-OLC] February Update Next: Re: [FT] CPV vs. NPV