Re: [OT] Columbia

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 devans@nebraska.edu wrote:

>
> ***
> I'd have to argue the "purely as an asthetic project" bit.
> ***
>
> He'll have to speak for hisself, but I think it was not artsy only
value he
> was arguing, but the artistic beauty produced is SUFFICIENT
justification.
> Everything else is gravy. ;->=
>
> If that his intent, I certainly understand what he's saying!

My apologies, Brian. I misunderstood what you were saying.

Mk