Prev: Re: [OT] Columbia Next: Re: [OT] Columbia

Re: [OT] Columbia

From: devans@n...
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:53:19 -0600
Subject: Re: [OT] Columbia


***
I'd have to argue the "purely as an asthetic project" bit.
***

He'll have to speak for hisself, but I think it was not artsy only value
he
was arguing, but the artistic beauty produced is SUFFICIENT
justification.
Everything else is gravy. ;->=

If that his intent, I certainly understand what he's saying!

The_Beast

Prev: Re: [OT] Columbia Next: Re: [OT] Columbia