QX [Was: Bravo Zulu]
From: Phillip Atcliffe <Phillip.Atcliffe@u...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:08:40 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: QX [Was: Bravo Zulu]
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 12:59:04 +0100 "K.H.Ranitzsch"
<KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:
> From: "Aaron Teske" <mithramuse@njaccess.com>
>> Having recently read the Lensman books, is Smith's use of "QX" based
on real codes, made up from something like the above, or just
wholly invented? It is pretty obvious what it *means* but I'm curious
if anyone has any insight as to whether it really "came from"
someplace. <<
> Not sure if it applies here, but many old abbreviations, especially
with odd letters, are from amateur wireless Morse practice. <
Not so amateur... many odd-looking abbreviation still in use come from
standard Morse codes that were used to reduce the amount of
transmission time needed to ask FAQ's, particularly with the then state
of the art in long-distance and airborne radios -- e.g., QNH and QFE
from air navigation. It's a heck of a lot quicker to send QFE to a
ground station than "What is the current ground-level air pressure?",
and equally the reply "QFE 2994" is a lot quicker and easier to
comprehend than a full sentence. We have better radios these days, so
Morse is a dying art, but the codes are still used.
Getting back to Smith, I always thought that QX was a sneaky way of
showing how language evolves over time. Kim Kinnison and co. use it
where we'd use OK, and comparing the letters made me think that this
was an unmentioned case of a gradual slide from one to the other
between now and whenever the stories were set. Don't think it had
anything to do with the use of Q in radio codes, except very
peripherally.
Phil
----
"Sic Transit Gloria Barramundi"
(Or, So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!)
-- not Douglas Adams, but me: Phil Atcliffe
(Phillip.Atcliffe@uwe.ac.uk)