Re: [OT}The Shah of Iran was: Mixed combat units
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:14:20 -0500
Subject: Re: [OT}The Shah of Iran was: Mixed combat units
At 8:00 AM +0100 10/29/02, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote:
>Everybody please pardon for picking up an off-topic subject...
>
>Ryan paints an extremely optimistic view of the Shah of Iran's rule.
It's
>equally, if not more, plausible, to draw quite a different picture.
Karl, go back about 40-60 more years before the time you are thinking
about (the Shah's father and Grandfather). Jews had status in the
society that wasn't 2nd class. They were accepted and encouraged. The
King and ruling class saw jewish bankers and other family run
businesses as a good thing and not a problem for their society.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ryan M Gill" <rmgill@mindspring.com>
>> I have to wonder given that Iran went through a golden age earlier
last
>century where
>> they had an extremely egalitarian form.
>
>Maybe egalitarian in terms of (official) gender relations. Hardly in
terms
>of political or economic equality.
>
>> Sadly this all went away with the rise of the religious state. A
strong
>and just king was required
>> to have such a culture of open-ness.
>
>Pardon me, but this reads like a tale from the Arabian nights. A few
things
>to consider:
No. Its sometimes how things work out with a strong monarch. It's not
by any means a given. However, the Mobocracy that followed the Shah
and the Theocracy that immediately followed that wasn't any kind of
improvement.
--
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/2)
----------------------------------------------------------