Prev: Re: F-scale bunk Next: Re:[OT] F-scale bunk

RE: [DS] Avalon Inc Weapons

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: [DS] Avalon Inc Weapons


--- Beth.Fulton@csiro.au wrote:

> What would you suggest something more like:
> 
>		 RANGE
> CLASS  CLOSE	MEDIUM	LONG
> GPC/1    36"	  40"	44"
> GPC/2    40"	  44"	48"
> GPC/3    44"	  48"	52"
> GPC/4    48"	  52"	56"
> GPC/5    52"	  56"	60"

If you want it to feel like an HEL with MDC kick.

Which means it would be expensive as hell.
 
> Or do you suggest longer range bands within each
> weapon type so something
> more like:
> 
>		 RANGE
> CLASS  CLOSE	MEDIUM	LONG
> GPC/1    28"	  36"	44"
> GPC/2    32"	  40"	48"
> GPC/3    36"	  44"	52"
> GPC/4    40"	  48"	56"
> GPC/5    44"	  52"	60"

This provide a difference between short and long that
might be important on the battlefield.	The above
schema would have the majority of shooting be at short
range on a battlefield with significant terrain
features.  This would be more reasonable points-wise,
maybe 20 per size class.

John

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Prev: Re: F-scale bunk Next: Re:[OT] F-scale bunk