RE: [DS] Avalon Inc Weapons
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: [DS] Avalon Inc Weapons
--- Beth.Fulton@csiro.au wrote:
> What would you suggest something more like:
>
> RANGE
> CLASS CLOSE MEDIUM LONG
> GPC/1 36" 40" 44"
> GPC/2 40" 44" 48"
> GPC/3 44" 48" 52"
> GPC/4 48" 52" 56"
> GPC/5 52" 56" 60"
If you want it to feel like an HEL with MDC kick.
Which means it would be expensive as hell.
> Or do you suggest longer range bands within each
> weapon type so something
> more like:
>
> RANGE
> CLASS CLOSE MEDIUM LONG
> GPC/1 28" 36" 44"
> GPC/2 32" 40" 48"
> GPC/3 36" 44" 52"
> GPC/4 40" 48" 56"
> GPC/5 44" 52" 60"
This provide a difference between short and long that
might be important on the battlefield. The above
schema would have the majority of shooting be at short
range on a battlefield with significant terrain
features. This would be more reasonable points-wise,
maybe 20 per size class.
John
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com