Re: Arab military effectiveness article was Test
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:19:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Arab military effectiveness article was Test
At 4:15 PM +0100 9/11/02, Phillip Atcliffe wrote:
>
>Interesting, but potentially dangerous. I noted the comment about the
>American perception of Japan before WW2, and the other examples given.
>With them in mind, I'd be wary of basing any practical strategies on
>that article, lest the same thing happen again.
Well, I take it that he's essentially warning not to take this as
faith that you'll walk over an Arab army. The preconceived notions
can lead you to under-estimate a foe. By the same toke, you can
overestimate a nation's military power (Gulf War) and benefit by it.
>It's rather ironic: the article begins with a description of why the
>article ought not to be relied on... and it's difficult to know if
>either or both should be believed.
He's really just explaining why people training Arab Military forces
find the whole process so frustrating. He extrapolates that since
armies fight as they train, that they'll likely have a harder time of
fighting against a better trained opponent.
Low level officer initiative is worth its weight in gold. Students of
WWII know that the biggest problem we had with the Germans was the
amazing ability for junior officers to organize local counter attacks
with what ever men were at hand and really FUBAR an Allied thrust
down a given axis.
--
Ryan Gill rmgill@SPAMmindspring.com
----------------------------------------------------------
| | | -==----
| O--=- | | /_8[*]°_\
|_/|o|_\_| | _________ | /_[===]_\
/ 00DA61 \ |/---------\| __/ \---
_w/|=_[__]_= \w_ // [_] o[]\\ _oO_\ /_O|_
|: O(4) == O :| _Oo\=======/_O_ |____\ /____|
|---\________/---| [__O_______W__] |x||_\ /_||x|
|s|\ /|s| |s|/BSV 575\|s| |x|-\| |/-|x|
|s|=\______/=|s| |s|=|_____|=|s| |x|--|_____|--|x|
|s| |s| |s| |s| |x| |x|
'60 Daimler Ferret '42 Daimler Dingo '42 Humber MkIV (1/3)
----------------------------------------------------------