Prev: Warfair Next: Re: Card initiative (Gauss rifles)

Re: [OT] RE: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti- tank rounds

From: Roger Books <books@j...>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:17:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [OT] RE: New 'electrical active' Armour to defeat hand held anti- tank rounds

Old Dawt Mill near where I grew up in the Ozarks.  There were pictures
made of the mill in which you can see a solid pebble that somehow
made it as an impurity into the glass.	These pictures are 80+
years old IIRC.  They still have the piece of glass, the pebble
has migrated down almost a foot (30cm) from it's original position.

Roger Books

On 22-Aug-02 at 03:12, Robertson, Brendan (Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au)
wrote:
> On Thursday, August 22, 2002 4:49 PM, Edward Lipsett
> [SMTP:translation@intercomltd.com] wrote:
> > Denser?
> > Or just thicker?
> > 
> > on 02.8.22 3:48 PM, Scott Siebold at gamers@ameritech.net
scribbleth:
> > > 
> > > An intersting side issue is glass is a high desity liquid which is
> > > slowly moving (glass that is 100+ years old is actually denser at
the
> > > base then at the top).
> 
> There are two schools of thought on that, neither of which have been
> conclusively proven.
> 1.  The stained glass panes were cast flat and then have pooled
towards the
> bottom over time.
> 2.  The glass panes were cast with thicker bottoms to help support the
> weight.
> 
> There is evidence to support both hypothesis, and it may be that both
are
> true.
> 
> Brendan
> 'Neath Southern Skies
> 
> 


Prev: Warfair Next: Re: Card initiative (Gauss rifles)